Legal Protection of Female Workers with Invisible Disabilities in Indonesia Based on Feminist Legal Theory Through the Analysis of Labor Law and Constitutional Court Decision No. 130/PUU-XXIII/2025

Authors

  • Indah Dwiprigitaningtias Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Author
  • Santi Yulistiawaty Yayasan Ruang Pulih Autoimun Disabilitas Author

Keywords:

Constitutional Court, Female Workers, Feminist Legal Theory, Invisible Disabilities, Reasonable Accommodation.

Abstract

Female workers with invisible disabilities face potential disadvantages when gendered employment expectations intersect with fluctuating functional limitations and disability-related stigma. This study examines Indonesian employment protections and the legal implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 130/PUU-XXIII/2025 through Feminist Legal Theory. A normative juridical design employed statutory, conceptual, and case approaches to analyze constitutional guarantees, manpower legislation, disability law, and the Court’s conditional interpretation. An unpublished YRPAD community position statement provided contextual material without constituting representative empirical evidence. The analysis identifies protections against discrimination, entitlements to reasonable accommodation, and corresponding employer obligations under existing legislation. The Court’s decision permits recognition of persons with certain chronic illnesses within the physical disability category following voluntary medical assessment, without automatically classifying all chronic illnesses or invisible conditions as disabilities. The interpretation expands potential access to established protections but does not independently establish workplace procedures for disclosure, confidentiality, or accommodation. Feminist and intersectional analysis indicates that formally neutral performance standards may disadvantage workers with fluctuating conditions, especially where gendered expectations shape employment assessments. Effective protection requires individualized adjustments, confidential requests, accessible complaints, and accountable enforcement. This study contributes a gender-responsive interpretation linking constitutional recognition to substantive employment equality while acknowledging the limits of documentary analysis.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abusalha, S. (2024). Insights into employment experiences of women with disabilities: A comparative qualitative study across seven countries. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 15(2), 161–201. https://doi.org/10.14267/CJSSP.2024.2.8

Ardini, N. P. A. M., Wacika, M. W., Sudiarawan, K. A., & Hardiyan, S. P. (2026). Disability rights violation: Failure to provide reasonable accommodation and employment discrimination against the colorblind in Indonesia. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v8i1.1-24

Arliman S., L., Ratnawati, E., & Razak, A. A. (2024). Legal guarantees for persons with disabilities to secure decent work: A human rights perspective from Indonesia. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 8(2), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.25072/jwy.v8i2.4463

Chan, X. W., & Hutchings, K. (2023). Inequalities, barriers, intersectionality, and facilitators of careers of women with disabilities: Themes and future research agenda from a scoping review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1104784. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104784

Chan, X. W., & Hutchings, K. (2025). Exploring the careers of women with disabilities: A systematic review and implications for human resource management. Personnel Review, 54(5), 1202–1251. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-01-2024-0086

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2026). Decision Number 130/PUU-XXIII/2025 concerning the judicial review of Law Number 8 of 2016 on Persons with Disabilities.

Darmawan, R. R., & Hamzah, A. S. (2024). Analisis perlindungan hukum terhadap pekerja wanita dari tindakan diskriminasi berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan. Private Law, 4(1), 184–193. https://doi.org/10.29303/prlw.v4i1.3924

Dirkareshza, R., Akbar, S. S., & Zaifa, G. A. (2024). Exploring employment rights for individuals with disabilities: A cross-national comparative analysis in the context of fair competition and Sustainable Development Goals. Alauddin Law Development Journal, 6(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v6i2.46473

Dwiprigitaningtias, I., Yulistiawaty, S., & Iqbal, F. M. (2026). Pengakuan disabilitas tak tampak dalam perspektif hukum Indonesia: Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 130/PUU-XXIII/2025. SINERGI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 3(6), 1891–1909. https://doi.org/10.62335/sinergi.v3i6.2642

Firmanda, T. (2025). Navigating barriers and building strengths: A case study of employment success among blind professional women in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 12(2), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.ijds.2025.12.2.3

Ginting, A. Z., & Abduh, R. (2026). From legal recognition to enforcement: Comparative protection of workers with disabilities in Indonesia and Malaysia. Al-Risalah: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah dan Hukum, 26(1), 813–827. https://doi.org/10.24252/al-risalah.vi.66119

Howe, D., O'Shea, M., Duffy, S., & Armour, M. (2025). From insight into action: Understanding how employer perspectives shape endometriosis-inclusive workplace policies. Healthcare, 13(8), Article 930. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080930

Mastrella, S. J., Powell, D. M., Bonaccio, S., & O’Doherty, K. C. (2026). Not an ideal worker, not a disabled worker: The experience of disclosing invisible disabilities at work. Journal of Business and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-026-10104-4

Mastrella, S. J., Powell, D. M., Bonaccio, S., & O'Doherty, K. C. (2026). Not an ideal worker, not a disabled worker: The experience of disclosing invisible disabilities at work. Journal of Business and Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-026-10104-4

Millmark, S., Vänje, A., & Palm, K. (2025). Living up to the ideal worker norm: A critical case study about women with invisible disabilities working from home. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal, 44(9), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-10-2024-0499

Nurhayati, T., Fibriani, R., Heradhyaksa, B., & Moenir, H. D. (2026). Beyond single-axis protection: Reconstructing labor law for disabled women in outsourcing relations. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(5), 4330–4343. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v6i5.3671

Pinilla-Roncancio, M., & Rodríguez Caicedo, N. (2022). Legislation on disability and employment: To what extent are employment rights guaranteed for persons with disabilities? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), Article 5654. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19095654

Republic of Indonesia. (1945). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.

Republic of Indonesia. (2003). Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower.

Republic of Indonesia. (2011). Law Number 19 of 2011 concerning the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Law Number 8 of 2016 concerning Persons with Disabilities.

Republic of Indonesia. (2023). Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the enactment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2022 on Job Creation into law.

Rohanawati, A. N., Hadi, S., & Rahman, T. (2023). A legal barrier to the enjoyment of the right to work for workers with disabilities. Jurnal HAM, 14(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2023.14.155-168

Sagmeister, M. (2026). Legal mechanisms of invisibilisation: Exclusion and differentiation. Feminist Legal Studies, 34, 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-025-09594-z

Santuzzi, A. M., Waltz, P. R., Finkelstein, L. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2014). Invisible disabilities: Unique challenges for employees and organizations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/iops.12134

Sari, P. M., Asengbaramae, R., & Kurniawan, E. (2026). Women's employment status in Indonesia: An intersectionality perspective on disability, household responsibilities, and socioeconomic factors. An-Nisa' Journal of Gender Studies, 19(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.35719/an-nisa.v19i1.467

Sercekman, M. Y., & Ayaz, O. (2026). “Swallowed by a black hole”: The neglected impact of endometriosis in the workplace. Human Resource Management Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.70056

Teborg, S., Hünefeld, L., & Gerdes, T. S. (2024). Exploring the working conditions of disabled employees: A scoping review. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 19, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-023-00397-z

United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

Woticky, G., Jetha, A., Tompa, E., & Gignac, M. A. M. (2025). Disclosure decisions of workers living with a chronic health condition causing disability at work: Are decisions to disclose to co-workers and supervisors different? Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 35(3), 675–687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10235-6

YRPAD. (n.d.). Perspektif YRPAD terhadap perlindungan pekerja dengan autoimun yang berdampak disabilitas (Unpublished community position statement).

Downloads

Published

2026-10-27

How to Cite

Legal Protection of Female Workers with Invisible Disabilities in Indonesia Based on Feminist Legal Theory Through the Analysis of Labor Law and Constitutional Court Decision No. 130/PUU-XXIII/2025. (2026). Iustitia: Journal of Legal Theory, Politics, and International Relations, 1(4), 16-30. https://sovereignresearch.org/iustitia/article/view/382