A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Learning Outcomes

Authors

Keywords:

cooperative learning; learning outcomes; meta-analysis; effect size; student achievement..

Abstract

Purpose This study examines the effectiveness of cooperative learning in improving students’ learning outcomes across different educational contexts. Although numerous studies have reported positive impacts of cooperative learning, variations in educational levels, subject areas, and instructional settings have produced fragmented evidence regarding its overall effectiveness. This study aims to synthesize empirical findings and estimate the magnitude of cooperative learning effects on learning outcomes.

Methods A meta-analysis was conducted following the PRISMA framework. Forty-seven studies cited in the reference list were initially identified, and twenty-seven eligible studies published between 2022 and 2025 were included in the quantitative synthesis. Data extraction and coding were performed systematically, and effect sizes were calculated using Hedges’ g. Statistical analyses employed a random-effects model, accompanied by heterogeneity tests, subgroup analyses, and publication bias assessments.

Findings The meta-analysis demonstrated that cooperative learning exerts a statistically significant positive effect on students’ learning outcomes, with an overall effect size indicating a moderate-to-large magnitude. Substantial heterogeneity among studies suggests that educational level and subject area contribute to variations in effectiveness. Higher education settings and technology-related subjects tended to produce stronger effects. Publication bias analyses indicated that the findings were robust and relatively free from substantial bias.

Research Implications The findings highlight the importance of integrating cooperative learning as a student-centered instructional framework that promotes interaction, engagement, and collaborative problem-solving. The results provide evidence-based implications for educators and policymakers in designing learning environments that support academic achievement and twenty-first-century competencies.

Originality This study provides a quantitative synthesis of recent evidence on cooperative learning by integrating findings across diverse educational levels and disciplines. The study offers updated evidence regarding the effectiveness, variability, and educational relevance of cooperative learning in contemporary learning environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhami, N., & Taghizadeh, M. (2024). Integrating inquiry-based learning and computer supported collaborative learning into flipped classroom: Effects on academic writing performance and perceptions of students of railway engineering. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(3), 521-557. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2046107

Bächtold, M., Roca, P., & De Checchi, K. (2023). Students' beliefs and attitudes towards cooperative learning, and their relationship to motivation and approach to learning. Studies in Higher Education, 48(1), 100-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2022.2112028

Boke, H., Aygun, Y., Tufekci, S., Yagin, F. H., Canpolat, B., Norman, G., ... & Ardigò, L. P. (2025). Effects of cooperative learning on students' learning outcomes in physical education: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1508808. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508808

Boud, D., & Bearman, M. (2024). The assessment challenge of social and collaborative learning in higher education. Educational philosophy and theory, 56(5), 459-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.2114346

Chistyakov, A. A., Zhdanov, S. P., Avdeeva, E. L., Dyadichenko, E. A., Kunitsyna, M. L., & Yagudina, R. I. (2023). Exploring the characteristics and effectiveness of project-based learning for science and STEAM education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), em2256. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13128

Chorfi, A., Hedjazi, D., Aouag, S., & Boubiche, D. (2022). Problem-based collaborative learning groupware to improve computer programming skills. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(1), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1795263

De Back, T. T., Tinga, A. M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2023). Learning in immersed collaborative virtual environments: design and implementation. Interactive learning environments, 31(8), 5364-5382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2006238

Doolittle, P., Wojdak, K., & Walters, A. (2023). Defining active learning: A restricted systematic review. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 11. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.11.25

Dzaiy, A. H. S., & Abdullah, S. A. (2024). The use of active learning strategies to foster effective teaching in higher education institutions. Zanco Journal of Human Sciences, 28(4), 328-351. https://doi.org/10.21271/zjhs.28.4.18

El Mahanani, P. S. (2022). Penerapan metode cooperative learning untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada mata pelajaran IPS kelas 3 SDN Tambakrejo Gurah Kediri. PTK: Jurnal Tindakan Kelas, 2(2), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.53624/ptk.v2i2.58

Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abdalla, M. E., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., & Al Kawas, S. (2022). Factors that affect student engagement in online learning in health professions education. Nurse Education Today, 110, 105261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105261

Feng, L. (2025). Investigating the effects of artificial intelligence-assisted language learning strategies on cognitive load and learning outcomes: A comparative study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(8), 1741-1774. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241268349

Fitrianto, I. (2024). Critical reasoning skills: Designing an education curriculum relevant to social and economic needs. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 245-258. https://doi.org/10.59944/postaxial.v2i4.393

Fitrianto, I. (2024). Innovation and technology in Arabic language learning in Indonesia: Trends and implications. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 134-150. https://doi.org/10.59944/postaxial.v2i3.375

Fitrianto, I., & Saif, A. (2024). The role of virtual reality in enhancing Experiential Learning: a comparative study of traditional and immersive learning environments. International Journal of Post Axial: Futuristic Teaching and Learning, 97-110. https://doi.org/10.59944/postaxial.v2i2.300

Fuchs, K. (2024). Challenges with gamification in higher education: A narrative review with implications for educators and policymakers. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(1), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE32021604

Glaister, C., Griggs, V., Martinez Gonzalez, O., & Hussain, M. (2024). Informal collaborative learning (ICL)--student perspectives on the role of informal collaborative learning ICL in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(8), 2025-2041. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2023.2177843

Goss, H. (2022). Student learning outcomes assessment in higher education and in academic libraries: A review of the literature. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(2), 102485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102485

Hasani, K., Khojir, K., Saparuddin, M., & Munawaroh, A. A. F. (2025). Implementation of Multicultural Education in Islamic Religious Education Learning to Foster Tolerance and Brotherhood in Junior High School (SMPN) 2 Samarinda. AL GHAZALI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pemikiran Islam, 5(2), 359-377. https://doi.org/10.69900/ag.v5i2.511

Houghton, D., Soles, G., Vogelsang, A., Irvine, V., Prince, F., Prince, L., ... & Paskevicius, M. (2022, December). Truth and reconciliation through inquiry-based collaborative learning. In The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Conference (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-8). https://doi.org/10.18357/otessac.2022.2.1.126

Hu, C., Li, X., Liu, D., Chen, X., Wang, J., & Liu, X. (2022). Teacher-student architecture for knowledge learning: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.17332. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.17332

Imawan, M. R. (2023). MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TPS-TGT PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKADI KELAS VIII SMP N 1 SEMARANG. Jurnal Studi Islam dan Hukum Syariah, 1(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3342/jursih.v1i1.14

Kaliisa, R., Misiejuk, K., López-Pernas, S., Khalil, M., & Saqr, M. (2024, March). Have learning analytics dashboards lived up to the hype? A systematic review of impact on students' achievement, motivation, participation and attitude. In Proceedings of the 14th learning analytics and knowledge conference (pp. 295-304). https://doi.org/10.1145/3636555.3636884

Kalyani, L. K. (2024). The role of technology in education: Enhancing learning outcomes and 21st century skills. International journal of scientific research in modern science and technology, 3(4), 05-10. https://doi.org/10.59828/ijsrmst.v3i4.199

Li, T., Ji, Y., & Zhan, Z. (2024). Expert or machine? Comparing the effect of pairing student teacher with in-service teacher and ChatGPT on their critical thinking, learning performance, and cognitive load in an integrated-STEM course. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305163

Li, Y. J., Cheung, C. M., Shen, X. L., & Lee, M. K. (2023). Promoting collaborative learning in virtual worlds: the power of "we". Information Technology & People, 36(6), 2563-2586. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-11-2021-0870

Lin, X. (2024). Exploring the role of ChatGPT as a facilitator for motivating self-directed learning among adult learners. Adult Learning, 35(3), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.1177/10451595231184928

Long, J., Chen, T., Nguyen, Q. V. H., & Yin, H. (2023). Decentralized collaborative learning framework for next POI recommendation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 41(3), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555374

McKay, J., & Sridharan, B. (2024). Student perceptions of collaborative group work (CGW) in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 49(2), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2227677

Mendo-Lázaro, S., León-del-Barco, B., Polo-del-Río, M. I., & López-Ramos, V. M. (2022). The impact of cooperative learning on university students' academic goals. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 787210. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787210

Muliawati, I., & Aldin, A. (2024). The Effectiveness of the Problem Based Learning Model on Elementary School Students' Mathematics Learning Outcomes. Journal of Indonesian Primary School, 1(2), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.62945/jips.v1i2.91

Nurliza, M., Lubis, A. H., & Lubis, S. S. W. (2024). Word Square Model Used by Poster Media to Improve Primary School Student Learning Outcomes. Journal of Indonesian Primary School, 1(1), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.62945/jips.v1i1.3

Orr, R. B., Csikari, M. M., Freeman, S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2022). Writing and using learning objectives. CBE---Life Sciences Education, 21(3), fe3. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.22-04-0073

Pan, X. (2023). Online learning environments, learners' empowerment, and learning behavioral engagement: The mediating role of learning motivation. Sage Open, 13(4), 21582440231205098. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231205098

Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students' learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371-2391. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1884886

Rahmah, S., & Lubis, A. H. (2024). Problem Posing as a Learning Model to Improve Primary School Students' Mathematics Learning Outcomes in Gayo Lues. Journal of Indonesian Primary School, 1(4), 93-104. https://doi.org/10.62945/jips.v1i4.409

Ridwan, M. R., & Hadi, S. (2022). A meta-analysis study on the effectiveness of a cooperative learning model on vocational high school students' mathematics learning outcomes. Participatory Educational Research, 9(4), 396-421. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.97.9.4

Sabah, N. M. (2023). The impact of social media-based collaborative learning environments on students' use outcomes in higher education. International Journal of Human--Computer Interaction, 39(3), 667-689. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2046921

Santos-Meneses, L. F., Pashchenko, T., & Mikhailova, A. (2023). Critical thinking in the context of adult learning through PBL and e-learning: A course framework. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101358

Siregar, R. S. (2024). Students' Preferences for Varied Learning Methods: An Empirical Study of the Effectiveness and Appeal of Diverse Instructional Approaches. Jurnal Profesi Guru Indonesia, 1(2), 140-152. https://doi.org/10.62945/jpgi.v1i2.679

Spatıotı, A., Kazanıdıs, I., & Pange, J. (2023). Educational design and evaluation models of the learning effectiveness in e-learning process: a systematic review. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(4), 318-347. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1177297

Tang, K. H. D. (2023). Student-centered approach in teaching and learning: What does it really mean?. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(2), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.218

Troussas, C., Giannakas, F., Sgouropoulou, C., & Voyiatzis, I. (2023). Collaborative activities recommendation based on students' collaborative learning styles using ANN and WSM. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1761835

Van der Meer, N., van der Werf, V., Brinkman, W. P., & Specht, M. (2023). Virtual reality and collaborative learning: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 4, 1159905. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2023.1159905

Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., & Kollar, I. (2022). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1799455

Welerubun, R. C., Wambrauw, H. L., Jeni, J., Wolo, D., & Damopolii, I. (2022). Contextual teaching and learning in learning environmental pollution: the effect on student learning outcomes. Prima Magistra: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 3(1), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.37478/jpm.v3i1.1487

Widjaja, G., & Aslan, A. (2022). Blended learning method in the view of learning and teaching strategy in geography study programs in higher education. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i1.1852

Yang, X., Zhou, X., & Hu, J. (2022). Students' preferences for seating arrangements and their engagement in cooperative learning activities in college English blended learning classrooms in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(4), 1356-1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1901667

Zaman, B. U. (2023). Transforming education through ai, benefits, risks, and ethical considerations. https://doi.org/10.36227/techrxiv.24231583.v1

Zheng, L., Niu, J., Zhong, L., & Gyasi, J. F. (2023). The effectiveness of artificial intelligence on learning achievement and learning perception: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5650-5664. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2015693

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning on Students’ Learning Outcomes. (2026). ESPD : Ephemeris Serena Populus Et Doctrina, 1(1), 01-18. https://sovereignresearch.org/espd/article/view/108