Legal Analysis Of Administrative Court Decision No. 16/G/2024/PTUN.JKT In A Civil Service Dispute
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65310/cse5a937Keywords:
Administrative Law, Civil Service Dispute, Judicial Review, Good Governance, Merit System.Abstract
This study examines Administrative Court Decision Number 16/G/2024/PTUN.JKT concerning a civil service dispute through a normative juridical approach that combines statutory, case based, and conceptual analyses. The research evaluates the legal validity of the contested administrative decision by examining the applicable regulatory framework, the judicial reasoning adopted by the court, and the relevance of the General Principles of Good Governance in administrative adjudication. The findings indicate that the court applied a comprehensive assessment of administrative legality by scrutinizing the conformity of governmental action with statutory requirements, procedural obligations, and governance standards recognized in Indonesian administrative law. The decision affirms the importance of legal certainty, accountability, transparency, and fairness as essential benchmarks for evaluating administrative conduct. The analysis further demonstrates that judicial review serves as an effective mechanism for protecting civil servants from arbitrary personnel actions while reinforcing merit based governance within public administration. The judgment contributes to the development of Indonesian administrative law by strengthening legal protection, promoting responsible administrative decision making, and enhancing institutional commitment to professional and rule based civil service governance.
Downloads
References
Adiyatma, S. E. (2023). Civil Law in Indonesia and Russia: Easy and Affordable Access to Legal Aid. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 4(3), 449-472.
Ago, M. S., Mardatillah, W., & Saodana, S. (2025). A Legal Analysis of Administrative Disputes Related to the Transfer of Civil Servants in the Makassar City Government. Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities, 6(2), 1014-1022.
Ahdout, Z. P. (2022). Enforcement lawmaking and judicial review. Harvard Law Review, 135(4), 937-1006.
Aniq, A., Utama, Y. J., & Sa’adah, N. (2026). Penguatan Perlindungan Hukum Pegawai Aparatur Sipil Negara melalui Rekonstruksi Banding Adminsitrasi. Integralistik, 37(1), 117-129.
Anwary, I. (2022). Evaluation of the effectiveness of public administration policies in the development of stringent legal framework: An analysis of the criminal justice system in Indonesia. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 17(2), 312-323.
Arif, I. A. L., & Boediningsih, W. (2022). Analisis Terhadap Putusan pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara yang terkait dengan Pembatalan Penerapan Pasal 87 ayat (4) UU ASN. Esensi Hukum, 4(1), 24-39.
Aufa, M. F., & Widodo, A. B. (2025). Analysis of Obstacles to Resolving Civil Service Disputes at the Yogyakarta Administrative Court. Strata Law Review, 3(2), 91-101.
Barysė, D., & Sarel, R. (2023). Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated?. Artificial intelligence and law, 1.
Bauer, M. W. (2024). Public administration under populist rule: Standing up against democratic backsliding. International Journal of Public Administration, 47(15), 1019-1031.
Bersch, K., & Fukuyama, F. (2023). Defining bureaucratic autonomy. Annual Review of Political Science, 26(1), 213-232.
Bone, R. A. P., & Yassine, C. (2025). Judicial and Administrative Approaches to Civil Service Dispute Resolution: A Comparative Study between Indonesia, India, and Egypt. International Journal of Constitutional and Administrative Law, 1(1), 21-41.
Cane, P. (2021). Administrative law (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Craig, P. (2021). Administrative law (9th ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Dyzenhaus, D. (2017). The constitution of law: Legality in a time of emergency (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Enny Agustina, S. E., & SH, M. (2022). Sengketa kepegawaian dalam sistem peradilan tata usaha negara. PT. RajaGrafindo Persada-Rajawali Pers.
Kusuma, M., Maliki, B. I., Hidayat, A., Kustinah, Y., Pratiwi, C., & Rudianto, E. (2025). Efektivitas PTUN dalam Sengketa Kepegawaian Daerah: Studi Kasus Seleksi Sekretaris Daerah Provinsi Banten Tahun 2025 (Merit System dan Kronologi Sengketa). Jurnal Jembatan Efektivitas Ilmu dan Akhlak Ahlussunah Wal Jama'ah, 6(4), 635-648.
Leheza, Y., Pisotska, K., Dubenko, O., Dakhno, O., & Sotskyi, A. (2023). The essence of the principles of Ukrainian law in modern jurisprudence. Revista jurídica portucalense, 342-363.
Mahy, P. (2022). Indonesia's Omnibus Law on job creation: legal hierarchy and responses to judicial review in the labour cluster of amendments. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 17(1), 51-75.
Mayluvinda, E. K., & Aurellia, I. A. (2024). Putusan Nomor 8/g/2020/pt. tun. jkt: Analisis Yuridis Upaya Administratif Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Kepegawaian. PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM, 12(2).
McConville, M., & Chui, W. H. (Eds.). (2017). Research methods for law (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.
Moynihan, D. (2022). Delegitimization, deconstruction and control: Undermining the administrative state. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 699(1), 36-49.
Nurfransiska, F., Dairani, D., & Endro, Y. H. (2025). Reformulation of Regional Administrative Law: A Study of Civil Servant Dispute Resolution in Local Government. Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum, 22(02), 331-356.
Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta. (2024). Putusan Nomor 16/G/2024/PTUN.JKT tentang sengketa kepegawaian Aparatur Sipil Negara. Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia.
Rahman, M. S., & NK, M. L. (2022). Analisis Problematika Putusan Tata Usaha Negara Dalam Sengketa Kepegawaian. KRTHA BHAYANGKARA, 16(2).
Republik Indonesia. (1986). Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1986 Nomor 77.
Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 35.
Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 160.
Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2014 Nomor 292.
Republik Indonesia. (2020). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 17 Tahun 2020 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 11 Tahun 2017 tentang Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2020 Nomor 68.
Republik Indonesia. (2023). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2023 tentang Aparatur Sipil Negara. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 141.
Rosada, D., & Sulastri, D. (2026). Kedudukan Hukum Aparatur Sipil Negara dalam Sengketa Kepegawaian: Tanggung Jawab, Perlindungan, dan Mekanisme Penyelesaian. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory, 4(1), 1140-1147.
Sari, A. R. (2023). The impact of good governance on the quality of public management decision making. Journal of Contemporary Administration and Management (ADMAN), 1(2), 39-46.
Sari, M., Panuntun, A., & Paselle, E. (2023). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Putusan PTUN Samarinda Nomor 13/G/2023/PTUN. SMD (Studi Kasus Pemberhentian Dalam Jabatan). JURNAL JUSTIQA, 5(2), 44-53.
Wardhani, L. T. A. L., Noho, M. D. H., & Natalis, A. (2022). The adoption of various legal systems in Indonesia: an effort to initiate the prismatic Mixed Legal Systems. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1), 2104710.
Yuwono, L. G., & Lie, G. (2026). Analisis Yuridis Normatif terhadap Keabsahan Pemberhentian ASN karena Tindak Pidana Jabatan dan Implikasinya terhadap Hak Kepegawaian: Penelitian. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(4), 24154-24159.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Cucu Robiatul Adawiah, Intan Nuraeni, Zorya Kanoubie Attar Bakhri, Bakhri3Muhammad Rafa Nur Hidayat, Taufiq Alamsyah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
